why was god going to kill moses

Malaps

3 min read

·

05-10-2024

72

0

Share

The question of why God intended to kill Moses is a curious and often perplexing topic discussed in various theological circles. This event is referenced in the book of Exodus, particularly Exodus 4:24-26, where it is stated that God sought to kill Moses during his journey back to Egypt. In this article, we will explore the context of this narrative, its implications, and some theological interpretations that shed light on this puzzling situation.

Understanding the Context

To fully comprehend why God intended to kill Moses, it is important to consider the context of the narrative. After Moses fled Egypt due to killing an Egyptian taskmaster, he lived in Midian for 40 years before receiving his divine commission at the burning bush. God instructed Moses to return to Egypt and lead the Israelites out of slavery.

Key Verse Analysis

The critical verses that address this issue are Exodus 4:24-26 (ESV):

"At a lodging place on the way, the Lord met him and sought to put him to death. Then Zipporah took a flint and cut off her son's foreskin and touched Moses' feet with it and said, 'Surely you are a bridegroom of blood to me!' So he let him alone."

Here, the text suggests that Moses' failure to circumcise his son, Gershom, may have been the reason behind God's wrath. Circumcision was a significant covenantal sign for the Israelites, marking their identity as God's chosen people.

Theological Interpretations

1. Covenantal Significance

One interpretation posits that Moses' neglect in performing this critical act of obedience demonstrated a lack of commitment to God's covenant. Circumcision was not merely a ritual; it was a matter of identity and belonging within God's people. By failing to circumcise his son, Moses was essentially disregarding God's command and covenantal relationship.

2. Divine Testing

Another perspective suggests that this was a divine test. God, in this view, was examining Moses' readiness for leadership. A leader who would lead the people out of bondage must first demonstrate obedience in his personal life and family. This incident highlights the importance of being faithful in small matters before being entrusted with greater responsibilities.

3. Cultural and Familial Tensions

Additionally, some scholars note the cultural tensions between Moses and his Midianite wife, Zipporah. Zipporah's decisive action to circumcise their son indicates that she understood the significance of the covenant, whereas Moses may have been conflicted. This perspective invites reflection on the interactions between faith, culture, and familial responsibilities.

Practical Example and Application

To grasp the implications of this narrative today, consider the concept of personal integrity within leadership. Just as Moses' personal failures put him at risk, contemporary leaders in any field must uphold values and responsibilities in both their public and private lives. For example, a business leader who neglects ethical practices at home may struggle to earn the trust of their employees and clients, just as Moses faced dire consequences for neglecting God's commands.

Conclusion

The incident where God intended to kill Moses serves as a profound reminder of the importance of obedience, identity, and integrity in one’s personal and leadership journey. By understanding the cultural, theological, and personal dimensions of this narrative, we can glean valuable lessons for our own lives.

Further Reading

For those interested in delving deeper into this subject, consider exploring:

• "The Book of Exodus: A Theological Commentary" for insights into the significance of covenantal practices.
• "Moses: A Life" for a biographical perspective on Moses’ experiences and challenges.

This examination of why God intended to kill Moses not only reveals the gravity of obedience to divine commands but also invites reflection on our roles and responsibilities as individuals within our communities and families.

Attribution: This article is inspired by discussions found on Academia.edu. While specific authorship details were not cited, the interpretations reflect a synthesis of scholarly analysis surrounding the subject matter.